4.7 Review

Can neuroimaging-based biomarkers predict response to cognitive remediation in patients with psychosis? A state-of-the-art review

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 305, Issue -, Pages 196-205

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.006

Keywords

Cognitive remediation; EEG; MRI; Psychosis; Personalized medicine

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [1 R43 MH121209-01]
  2. Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2016-02361283]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognitive Remediation (CR) has varying effects on patients with major psychotic disorders (MPD), and neuroimaging-based biomarkers can predict treatment response. Auditory mismatch negativity, auditory steady-state response, gray matter morphology, white matter microstructure, and task-based fMRI can predict response to CR, while other biomarkers require further research.
Background: Cognitive Remediation (CR) is designed to halt the pathological neural systems that characterize major psychotic disorders (MPD), and its main objective is to improve cognitive functioning. The magnitude of CR-induced cognitive gains greatly varies across patients with MPD, with up to 40% of patients not showing gains in global cognitive performance. This is likely due to the high degree of heterogeneity in neural activation patterns underlying cognitive endophenotypes, and to inter-individual differences in neuroplastic potential, cortical organization and interaction between brain systems in response to learning. Here, we review studies that used neuroimaging to investigate which biomarkers could potentially serve as predictors of treatment response to CR in MPD. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. An electronic database search (Embase, Elsevier; Scopus, PsycINFO, APA; PubMed, APA) was conducted in March 2021. peer-reviewed, English-language studies were included if they reported data for adults aged 18+ with MPD, reported findings from randomized controlled trials or single-arm trials of CR; and presented neuroimaging data. Results: Sixteen studies were included and eight neuroimaging-based biomarkers were identified. Auditory mismatch negativity (3 studies), auditory steady-state response (1), gray matter morphology (3), white matter microstructure (1), and task-based fMRI (7) can predict response to CR. Efference copy corollary/discharge, resting state, and thalamo-cortical connectivity (1) require further research prior to being implemented. Conclusions: Translational research on neuroimaging-based biomarkers can help elucidate the mechanisms by which CR influences the brain's functional architecture, better characterize psychotic subpopulations, and ultimately deliver CR that is optimized and personalized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available