4.6 Article

35-Year-Old Parents Do Not Approve of 17-Year-Olds' Cigarette, Marijuana, or Alcohol Use: US National Data 1993-2018

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages 989-992

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.01.001

Keywords

Adolescent substance use; Marijuana use; Alcohol use; Cigarette use; Parenting; Parent attitudes

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01DA001411, R01DA016575, R01DA037902]
  2. National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The majority of 35-year-old parents disapprove of adolescent substance use, and parents' recent abstinence from substance use is associated with their disapproval.
Purpose: Parents' attitudes about adolescent substance use likely guide their parenting behaviors. This study documents prevalence of parents' disapproval of adolescent substance use and char-acteristics associated with disapproval. Methods: Survey data from national samples of 35-year-old parents from the U.S. Monitoring the Future study were collected 1993-2018. Multivariable logistic regression examined predictors of disapproving attitudes about substance use by a hypothetical 17-year-old child, including occa-sional marijuana use or drunkenness, and regular cigarette, marijuana, or alcohol use. Results: Across all cohorts, rates of disapproving attitudes ranged from 93.7% disapproving of getting drunk occasionally to 97.2% disapproving of regular cigarette use, with some erosion in disapproval for some substances across cohorts. Parents' own recent abstinence from substance use predicted greater odds of disapproval. Conclusions: The overwhelming majority of 35-year-old parents disapprove of adolescent sub-stance use. Prevention and public health messaging can support parenting by sharing this important information. (c) 2022 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available