4.4 Review

Prediction of immune checkpoint blockade-related hepatitis in metastatic melanoma patients

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14726

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) Immune Oncology Foundation [FA19-009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The introduction of clinical antibodies against PD-1 and CTLA-4 has greatly impacted cancer treatment, but immune-related adverse events remain a challenge. A recent study revealed that a subset of melanoma patients treated with PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade is prone to develop hepatitis, and this risk is associated with the expansion of effector memory CD4+ T cells in blood before treatment. This finding highlights the potential of using T-EM cell expansion as a biomarker for identifying patients who may need prophylactic treatment against CMV.
The introduction of clinical antibodies against programmed death-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) has revolutionized cancer treatment. Immune checkpoint blockade has enormous therapeutic potential and is widely prescribed for treating various cancers. However, immune-related adverse events in checkpoint blockade-treated patients are common and limit its clinical application. Despite efforts to understand the etiology of immune-related adverse events, the underlying cellular reactions remain elusive. Recently, our group identified a subset of patients with metastatic melanoma that are predisposed to hepatitis after combined PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade. These patients are characterized by pre-treatment expansion of effector memory CD4+ T cells (T-EM cells) in blood. We attributed this expansion to chronic or recurrent subclinical immune responses against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Accordingly, baseline expansion of T-EM cells is a reliable biomarker of hepatitis risk that identifies a subgroup of patients who might benefit from prophylactic CMV treatment with valganciclovir.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available