4.4 Article

Clinical and prognostic significance of antinuclear antibodies in primary antiphospholipid syndrome: A multicenter retrospective study

Journal

JOINT BONE SPINE
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105297

Keywords

Antiphospholipid syndrome; Antiphospholipid antibodies; Antinuclear antibodies; Outcome

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the clinical and biological data of 195 APS patients were retrospectively analyzed, revealing that APS patients with antinuclear antibodies (ANA-positive APS) may have a more severe clinical phenotype and prognosis, without increasing the risk of developing SLE. Prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the effects of additional therapies in this subset of APS.
Introduction: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (1) is defined by the development of vascular thrombosis, or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) can be detected in primary APS patients without any clinical systemic autoimmune disease. The presence of ANA antibodies could confer a specific phenotype in primary APS. Objective: To evaluate the characteristics of APS patients with antinuclear antibodies without other autoimmune disease (ANA positive APS patients) in comparison with primary APS without ANA or secondary APS patients with associated systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Clinical and biologic data from 195 APS were retrospectively collected and patients were classified as primary APS with positive ANA (ANA-positive APS), primary APS without any ANA (ANA-negative APS), and SLE-associated APS (SLE-APS). Results: Fourty patients (21%) were classified into ANA-positive APS group, 77 (39%) in ANA-negative APS and 78 (40%) in SLE-APS. In ANA-positive APS patients, 20 patients (51%) had arterial thrombosis, 14 (41%) had veinous thrombosis and 19% had obstetrical complications. There was no difference between the three groups for the frequency of thrombotic manifestations and obstetrical complications. ANA-positive APS patients had more non-criteria manifestations than ANA-negative APS (48% versus 25%; P <= 0.01). ANA-positive APS had more triple aPL positivity (59% versus 18%; P < 0.001) and more thrombosis and obstetrical recurrences (63% versus 36%; P < 0.01) in comparison with ANA-negative APS patients. ANA-positive APS had more triple aPL positivity than SLE-APS patients (54% versus 33%; P < 0.05). ANA-positive APS and SLE-APS patients had similar clinical manifestations, and recurrences. Despite a limited follow-up (28 months (11-50)) none of the ANA-positive APS develop SLE. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies were similar for the three groups. SLE-APS patients received more immunomodulatory therapies. Conclusion: ANA positivity in patients with APS enables to individualize a subset of patients with a more severe phenotype. Whereas the ANA positivity does not seem to be associated with the risk to develop SLE, prospective studies with a longer follow-up are necessary, in particular to evaluate the effect of additional therapies in this subset of APS. (C) 2021 Societe francaise de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available