4.6 Article

International Hand Function Study Following Distal Radial Access The RATATOUILLE Study

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 1205-1215

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.023

Keywords

anatomical snuffbox; distal radial access; hand function; motor; sensory; transradial access

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study comprehensively evaluated hand function in patients undergoing distal radial access (DRA) and found that DRA was not associated with hand function impairment. DRA emerges as a safe alternative vascular access.
BACKGROUND Distal radial access (DRA) has been proposed to improve procedure ergonomics and favor radial artery patency. Although promising data, nothing is known on evolving hand function after DRA. OBJECTIVES This study sought to comprehensively evaluate hand function in patients undergoing DRA. METHODS Real-world patients undergoing DRA undertook a thorough multimodality assessment of hand function implementing multidomain questionnaires (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Levine-Katz), and motor (pinch grip test) and sensory (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments test) examinations of both hands. All assessments were performed at preprocedural baseline and planned at 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up (FU). Adverse clinical and procedural events were documented too. RESULTS Data of 313 patients (220 men, age 66 +/- 10 years) from 9 international centers were analyzed. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Levine-Katz scores slightly improved from baseline to FU (P = 0.008 and P = 0.029, respectively). Pinch strength mildly improved from baseline to FU (P < 0.001 for both the left and right hands). Similarly, touch pressure threshold appeared to faintly improve in both the left and right hands (P < 0.012 for all the sites). For both motor and sensory function tests, comparable findings were found for the DRA hand and the contralateral one, with no significant differences between them. Repeated assessment of all tests over all FU time points similarly showed lack of worsening hand function. Access-related adverse events included 19 harmless bleedings and 3 forearm radial artery and 3 distal radial artery occlusions. None affected hand function at FU. CONCLUSIONS In a systematic multidimensional assessment, DRA was not associated with hand function impairment. Moreover, DRA emerges as a safe alternative vascular access. (C) 2022 the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available