4.5 Article

Facile hydrothermal synthesis of α-MnO2 and δ-MnO2 for pseudocapacitor applications

Journal

IONICS
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages 3501-3509

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-022-04562-y

Keywords

MnO2; Hydrothermal treatment; Pseudocapacitor; Electrochemical performance

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [21-43-00023]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [21-43-00023] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the electrochemical performances of hydrothermally treated α-MnO2 and δ-MnO2 were compared. The results showed that δ-MnO2 had a higher specific capacitance than α-MnO2, attributed to its layered structure and pseudocapacitance behavior. Additionally, δ-MnO2 exhibited high electrochemical stability, making it a suitable electrode material for pseudocapacitors.
We report the comparison of the electrochemical performances of alpha-MnO2 and delta-MnO2 produced by hydrothermal treatment. The structure and morphology of these materials were analyzed by SEM, HRTEM, XRD, and XPS, while their electrochemical properties were tested in the 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous electrolyte by cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge-discharge measurements, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The specific capacitance of delta-MnO2 at 1 mV.s(-1) was 4.8 times higher than that of alpha-MnO2 (211 vs. 44 F.g(-1)) because of the layered structure of delta-MnO2 that provided better availability of the electrode surface for electrolyte ions during charge-discharge cycles and pseudocapacitance behavior attributed to faradaic redox reactions. Moreover, delta-MnO2 revealed high electrochemical stability (more than 98% of the initial capacitance after 5000 charge/discharge cycles) confirming its good performance as an electrode material for pseudocapacitors. The contributions of surface and diffusion capacitances were analyzed by the differentiation method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available