4.2 Article

Point of care ultrasound in pelvic health: scope of practice, education and governance for physiotherapists

Journal

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 33, Issue 10, Pages 2669-2680

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05200-x

Keywords

PoCUS; Ultrasound imaging; Scope of practice; Education; Governance; Physiotherapy; Pelvic floor; Pelvic health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article highlights the importance of utilizing ultrasound imaging in the hands of assessing and treating clinicians, specifically in the field of pelvic health and dysfunction. Physiotherapists play a vital role in a multidisciplinary team, assisting in diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and patient self-management.
Pelvic health and pelvic floor dysfunction have wide-reaching implications across a range of patient groups. Placing ultrasound imaging into the hands of assessing and treating clinicians (i.e. point of care ultrasound, PoCUS) can provide a step change in clinical effectiveness and efficiency. Pelvic floor dysfunction is managed by one or more members of a multi-disciplinary team that includes physiotherapists. Physiotherapists' involvement includes diagnosis, patient education, identifying shared treatment goals, using rehabilitative strategies and empowering patients through self-management. Drawing upon existing publications in this area and applying framework principles, the authors propose a clinical and sonographic scope of practice for physiotherapists as part of supporting the consolidation and expansion of pelvic health PoCUS. Education and governance considerations are detailed to ensure the robust and safe use of this modality. Alongside empowering the use of ultrasound imaging by clinicians such as physiotherapists in the UK and internationally, we provide clarity to other members of the care pathway and ultrasound imaging professionals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available