4.2 Article

Rethinking the Effective Sample Size

Journal

INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 525-550

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/insr.12500

Keywords

Bayesian inference; effective sample size; importance sampling; Monte Carlo methods

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche of France under PISCES [ANR-17-CE40-0031-01]
  2. Spanish government [FPU19/00815]
  3. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI) [PID2019-105032GB-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper revisits the approximation of effective sample size (ESS) in the context of importance sampling and finds the existing approximations problematic. The authors propose new research directions for multiple importance sampling and alternative metrics.
The effective sample size (ESS) is widely used in sample-based simulation methods for assessing the quality of a Monte Carlo approximation of a given distribution and of related integrals. In this paper, we revisit the approximation of the ESS in the specific context of importance sampling. The derivation of this approximation, that we will denote as (ESS) over cap, is partially available in a 1992 foundational technical report of Augustine Kong. This approximation has been widely used in the last 25 years due to its simplicity as a practical rule of thumb in a wide variety of importance sampling methods. However, we show that the multiple assumptions and approximations in the derivation of (ESS) over cap make it difficult to be considered even as a reasonable approximation of the ESS. We extend the discussion of the (ESS) over cap in the multiple importance sampling setting, we display numerical examples and we discuss several avenues for developing alternative metrics. This paper does not cover the use of ESS for Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available