4.5 Review

Moving beyond radiographic alignment: applying the Wald Principles in the adoption of robotic total knee arthroplasty

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 365-373

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05411-3

Keywords

Knee arthroplasty; Robotic; Efficiency; Ergonomics; Artificial intelligence; Cost

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of robotics in TKA is growing rapidly, with improved accuracy and reproducibility. While clinical benefits may not be significantly different from conventional techniques, robotics can provide other advantages, such as reducing inventory, streamlining surgical trays, improving workflows and surgical efficiency.
The use of robotics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is growing at an exponential rate. Despite the improved accuracy and reproducibility of robotic-assisted TKA, consistent clinical benefits have yet to be determined, with most studies showing comparable functional outcomes and survivorship between robotic and conventional techniques. Given the success and durability of conventional TKA, measurable improvements in these outcomes with robotic assistance may be difficult to prove. Efforts to optimize component alignment within two degrees of neutral may be an attainable but misguided goal. Applying the Wald Principles of rationalization, it is possible that robotic technology may still prove beneficial, even when equivalent clinical outcomes as conventional methods, if we look beyond the obvious surrogate measures of success. Robotic systems may help to reduce inventory, streamline surgical trays, enhance workflows and surgical efficiency, optimize soft tissue balancing, improve surgeon ergonomics, and integrate artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms into a broader digital ecosystem. This article explores these less obvious alternative benefits of robotic surgery in the field of TKA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available