4.7 Article

A survey on fault-tolerant consensus control of multi-agent systems: trends, methodologies and prospects

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE
Volume 53, Issue 13, Pages 2800-2813

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2022.2056772

Keywords

Multi-agent system; fault-tolerant control; consensus; actuator fault; sensor fault; privacy preserving

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61733009]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0700300]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021M701902]
  4. Shuimu Scholar Program of Tsinghua University [2021SM040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the research progress in the fault-tolerant consensus control (FTCC) problem, discussing it from the perspectives of physical security and logical security. The article also presents the latest research results on FTCC where both physical and logical security are considered simultaneously, as well as outlines potential future research directions.
The consensus control problem of multi-agent systems (MASs) has received an increasing research interest with ever-developing consensus theory. Before it can be widely applied to actual engineering, the consensus theory needs to be improved by addressing some practical problems. One of the key problems is how to ensure the desirable performance of each agent as well as the entire MAS when confronted with faults, which is referred to as the fault-tolerant consensus control (FTCC) issue. In this survey, we review the classic and recent results in the context of FTCC from two aspects, namely, physical security and logical security. In addition, we provide the latest results on FTCC where the physical and logical security are considered simultaneously in a framework. Finally, we outline several potential future research topics on the FTCC issue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available