Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 241, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111484
Keywords
Anisotropic rock; Fracture growth; Maximum tangential stress; Maximum energy release rate; Maximum strain energy density
Categories
Funding
- ETH research grant, Switzerland [ETH-07 18-2]
- Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research-Supply of Electricity (SCCER-SoE) , Switzerland
- Werner Siemens Foundation (Werner Siemens-Stiftung) , Switzerland
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study evaluates the accuracy of three fracture growth theories in predicting crack trajectories in anisotropic rocks through comparison with new experimental data. The results show that anisotropy can offset or reinforce the loading influence in determining the direction of crack growth, depending on the loading configurations. It is demonstrated that the modified forms of the maximum tangential stress (MTS) and maximum energy release rate (MERR) criteria give better predictions of fracture growth paths compared to the modified maximum strain energy density (MSED) criterion.
We evaluate the accuracy of three well-known fracture growth theories to predict crack trajectories in anisotropic rocks through comparison with new experimental data. The results of 99 fracture toughness tests on the metamorphic Grimsel Granite under four different ratios of mixed-mode I/II loadings are reported. For each ratio, the influence of the anisotropy orientation on the direction of fracture growth is also analyzed. Our results show that for certain loading configurations, the anisotropy offsets the loading influence in determining the direction of crack growth, whereas in other configurations, these factors reinforce each other. To evaluate the accuracy of the fracture growth theories, we compare the experiment results for the kink angle and the effective fracture toughness with the predictions of the maximum tangential stress (MTS), the maximum energy release rate (MERR), and the maximum strain energy density (MSED) criteria. The criteria are first assessed in their classical forms employed in the literature. It is demonstrated that the energy-based criteria in their classical formulation cannot yield good predictions. We then present modified forms of the ERR and SED functions in which the tensile and shear components are decomposed. These modified forms give significantly better predictions of fracture growth paths. The evaluation of the three criteria illustrates that the modified MSED criterion is the least accurate model even in the modified form, while the results predicted by MTS and modified MERR are well matched with the experimental results.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available