4.7 Article

Modelling and online training method for digital twin workshop

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
Volume 61, Issue 12, Pages 3943-3962

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2051088

Keywords

Digital twin modelling; digital twin aggregate; online training; model validation; spatio-temporal data model; digital twin workshop

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a modelling and online training method for digital twin workshop to address the difficulties in modelling, simulation, and verification. It describes a multi-level digital twin aggregate modelling method and a digital twin organization system. A spatio-temporal data model is constructed based on the data demand for digital twin aggregates. The paper also presents a training method using truncated normal distribution and a verification method based on real-virtual error for digital twin models. The effectiveness of real-time status monitoring, online model training, and production simulation is verified through a case study.
Aiming at the difficulties in modelling, simulation and verification in digital twin workshop, a modelling and online training method for digital twin workshop is proposed. This paper describes a multi-level digital twin aggregate modelling method, including the status attributes, the static performance attributes and the fluctuation performance attributes, and designs a digital twin organisation system, namely, digital twin graph. According to the data demand for digital twin aggregates, a spatio-temporal data model is constructed. The digital twin model training method using truncated normal distribution is presented. Furthermore, a verification method based on real-virtual error for a digital twin model is proposed. The effectiveness of real-time status monitoring, online model training and simulation for production is verified by a case.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available