4.6 Article

Susceptibility of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) to Heat Stress During Floral Development and Anthesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE
Volume 202, Issue 6, Pages 508-517

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jac.12172

Keywords

abiotic stress; climate change; faba bean; heat stress; Vicia faba; yield

Categories

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F01659X/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1100711] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experiments were conducted over 2years to quantify the response of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to heat stress. Potted winter faba bean plants (cv. Wizard) were exposed to temperature treatments (18/10; 22/14; 26/18; 30/22; 34/26 degrees C day/night) for 5days during floral development and anthesis. Developmental stages of all flowers were scored prior to stress, plants were grown in exclusion from insect pollinators to prevent pollen movement between flowers, and yield was harvested at an individual pod scale, enabling effects of heat stress to be investigated at a high resolution. Susceptibility to stress differed between floral stages; flowers were most affected during initial green-bud stages. Yield and pollen germination of flowers present before stress showed threshold relationships to stress, with lethal temperatures (t(50)) 28 degrees C and similar to 32 degrees C, while whole plant yield showed a linear negative relationship to stress with high plasticity in yield allocation, such that yield lost at lower nodes was partially compensated at higher nodal positions. Faba bean has many beneficial attributes for sustainable modern cropping systems but these results suggest that yield will be limited by projected climate change, necessitating the development of heat tolerant cultivars, or improved resilience by other mechanisms such as earlier flowering times.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available