4.7 Review

Phage Therapy in the Era of Multidrug Resistance in Bacteria: A Systematic Review

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094577

Keywords

phage therapy; bacteriophages; multidrug-resistant bacteria; infections

Funding

  1. Direccion General de Investigaciones of the Universidad Santiago de Cali [2847-20220212, 3047-20220212, 01-2022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article evaluates the effectiveness and safety of phage therapy for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections through a systematic review of published studies. The results show that phage therapy could be an effective and safe alternative treatment for patients with these infections, although personalized treatment is necessary due to the specificity of phages.
Bacteriophages offer an alternative for the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacterial diseases as their mechanism of action differs from that of antibiotics. However, their application in the clinical field is limited to specific cases of patients with few or no other alternative therapies. This systematic review assesses the effectiveness and safety of phage therapy against multidrug-resistant bacteria through the evaluation of studies published over the past decade. To that end, a bibliographic search was carried out in the PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. Of the 1500 studies found, 27 met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 165 treated patients. Treatment effectiveness, defined as the reduction in or elimination of the bacterial load, was 85%. Except for two patients who died from causes unrelated to phage therapy, no serious adverse events were reported. This shows that phage therapy could be an alternative treatment for patients with infections associated with multidrug-resistant bacteria. However, owing to the phage specificity required for the treatment of various bacterial strains, this therapy must be personalized in terms of bacteriophage type, route of administration, and dosage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available