4.7 Article

Intra-Laboratory Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods and Assessment of a Droplet Digital PCR for the Detection of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri on Different Citrus Species

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094975

Keywords

citrus bacterial canker; Citrus lemon; Citrus sinensis; diagnostics; DNA quality

Funding

  1. European Union Commission [SI2.809508]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the influence of four different DNA extraction methods on the reliability of detecting citrus bacterial canker. The droplet digital PCR method was found to be more effective based on the comparison of real-time PCR standard curves and the evaluation of performance criteria of spiked samples.
Xanthomonas citri pv. citri (Xcc) and X. citri pv. aurantifolii (Xca), causal agents of citrus bacterial canker, are both regulated by the European Union to prevent their introduction. Xcc is responsible for severe outbreaks of citrus production worldwide, therefore, a prompt and reliable detection is advisable for the early detection of this bacterium either in symptomatic or asymptomatic plant material. The current EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization) diagnostic protocol, PM 7/44(1), includes several diagnostic tests even if new assays have been developed in the latter years for which validation data are needed. Recently, a test performance study was organized within the Valitest EU Project to validate Xcc diagnostic methods and provide evidence on the most reliable assays; however, the influence of DNA extraction methods (DEM) on the reliability of the detection has never been assessed. In this study we evaluate four different DEM, by following two different approaches: (i) a comparison by real-time PCR standard curves of bacterial DNA versus bacterial DNA added to plant DNA (lemon, leaves and fruit; orange fruit); and (ii) the evaluation of performance criteria of spiked samples (plant extract added with ten-fold diluted bacterial suspensions at known concentrations). Droplet digital PCR is developed and compared with real-time PCR, as the detection method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available