4.7 Article

Exploring Pharmacological Functions of Alternatively Spliced Variants of the Mu Opioid Receptor Gene, Oprm1, via Gene-Targeted Animal Models

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063010

Keywords

opioid; mu opioid receptor; OPRM1; alternative splicing; gene targeting; animal model

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health [DA013997, DA029244, DA042888, DA048379, DA07242, DA09040]
  2. Mayday Foundation
  3. Peter F. McManus Charitable Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mu opioid receptor gene OPRM1 undergoes extensive alternative pre-mRNA splicing to generate multiple splice variants, which have distinct pharmacological functions. Gene-targeted mouse models have been used to study the functional importance of these splice variants in the actions of mu opioids.
The mu opioid receptor has a distinct place in the opioid receptor family, since it mediates the actions of most opioids used clinically (e.g., morphine and fentanyl), as well as drugs of abuse (e.g., heroin). The single-copy mu opioid receptor gene, OPRM1, goes through extensive alternative pre-mRNA splicing to generate numerous splice variants that are conserved from rodents to humans. These OPRM1 splice variants can be classified into three structurally distinct types: (1) full-length 7 transmembrane (TM) carboxyl (C)-terminal variants; (2) truncated 6TM variants; and (3) single TM variants. Distinct pharmacological functions of these splice variants have been demonstrated by both in vitro and in vivo studies, particularly by using several unique gene-targeted mouse models. These studies provide new insights into our understanding of the complex actions of mu opioids with regard to OPRM1 alternative splicing. This review provides an overview of the studies that used these gene-targeted mouse models for exploring the functional importance of Oprm1 splice variants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available