4.7 Article

Sample-Specific Perturbation of Gene Interactions Identifies Pancreatic Cancer Subtypes

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094792

Keywords

pancreatic adenocarcinoma; gene interactions; prognosis; network-based subtypes

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82103570, 81972569]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the researchers used a gene interaction network to explore the subtypes of pancreatic cancer and found that these subtypes exhibit significant heterogeneity in clinical features, genetic mutations, immune cell infiltration, and treatment response.
Pancreatic cancer is a highly fatal disease and an increasing common cause of cancer mortality. Mounting evidence now indicates that molecular heterogeneity in pancreatic cancer significantly impacts its clinical features. However, the dynamic nature of gene expression pattern makes it difficult to rely solely on gene expression alterations to estimate disease status. By contrast, biological networks tend to be more stable over time under different situations. In this study, we used a gene interaction network from a new point of view to explore the subtypes of pancreatic cancer based on individual-specific edge perturbations calculated by relative gene expression value. Our study shows that pancreatic cancer patients from the TCGA database could be separated into four subtypes based on gene interaction perturbations at the individual level. The new network-based subtypes of pancreatic cancer exhibited substantial heterogeneity in many aspects, including prognosis, phenotypic traits, genetic mutations, the abundance of infiltrating immune cell, and predictive therapeutic efficacy (chemosensitivity and immunotherapy efficacy). The new network-based subtypes were closely related to previous reported molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. This work helps us to better understand the heterogeneity and mechanisms of pancreatic cancer from a network perspective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available