4.5 Article

Circulating microRNAs as novel prognosis biomarkers for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 1042-1046

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2015.1045692

Keywords

biomarker; circulating miRNA; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; miR-99a; miR-223

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [25293149, 23659327]
  2. Mie University
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H04784, 25293149, 23659327, 15K15237, 25670313, 24390172, 26460813, 26293148] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are emerging as promising non-invasive biomarkers for human cancer. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a prevalent malignancy worldwide, but its overall survival has remained unchanged in the past 3 decades. Biomarkers for evaluating efficacy of cancer therapy are urgently needed. To explore circulating miRNAs as cancer therapy biomarkers, we initially identified that 8 miRNAs were distinctly dysregulated in cancerous tissues compared with adjacent non-cancerous counterparts from 16 patients, using microarray and real-time PCR. Based on this discovery, the comparison study was performed between pre- and 6 months post-operative paired plasma samples on 9 patients. MiR-99a, which was down-regulated in cancerous tissues, was significantly increased in plasma after operation. Meanwhile, oncomiR miR-21 and miR-223 that were up-regulated in cancerous tissues, were significantly reduced in post-operative plasma samples. We firstly report the significant changes of miR-99a in plasma of HNSCC patients after surgery. Furthermore, plasma miR-223 was inversely increased in a patient whose cancer relapsed within 6 months after operation. We conclude that these circulating miRNAs may serve as biomarkers to evaluate the efficacy of therapy and the prognosis of HNSCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available