4.7 Article

Low-Dose Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol as Beneficial Treatment for Aged APP/PS1 Mice

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052757

Keywords

delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol; cannabidiol; Alzheimer's disease; radial arm water maze test; amyloid-beta; APP; PS1 transgenic mice

Funding

  1. NIH [R01-AG056569, R01-AG051500]
  2. Insys Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of low-dose delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The results showed that low-dose THC can reduce amyloid-beta aggregation and improve spatial learning in aged AD mouse models.
Studies on the effective and safe therapeutic dosage of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been sparse due to the concern about THC's psychotropic activity. The present study focused on demonstrating the beneficial effect of low-dose THC treatment in preclinical AD models. The effect of THC on amyloid-beta (A beta) production was examined in N2a/A beta PPswe cells. An in vivo study was conducted in aged APP/PS1 transgenic mice that received an intraperitoneal injection of THC at 0.02 and 0.2 mg/kg every other day for three months. The in vitro study showed that THC inhibited A beta aggregation within a safe dose range. Results of the radial arm water maze (RAWM) test demonstrated that treatment with 0.02 and 0.2 mg/kg of THC for three months significantly improved the spatial learning performance of aged APP/PS1 mice in a dose-dependent manner. Results of protein analyses revealed that low-dose THC treatment significantly decreased the expression of A beta oligomers, phospho-tau and total tau, and increased the expression of A beta monomers and phospho-GSK-3 beta (Ser9) in the THC-treated brain tissues. In conclusion, treatment with THC at 0.2 and 0.02 mg/kg improved the spatial learning of aged APP/PS1 mice, suggesting low-dose THC is a safe and effective treatment for AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available