4.2 Article

Diffusivities and atomic mobilities in the Ni-rich fcc Ni-Al-Cu alloys: experiment and modeling

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH
Volume 113, Issue 5, Pages 351-371

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/ijmr-2021-8426

Keywords

Atomic mobility; CALTPP program; Diffusivity; Experimental measurements; Ni-Al-Cu alloy

Funding

  1. Genetic Engineering Project of Materials in Yunnan Province [2019ZE001-1]
  2. Research Fund for foreign young scholars of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51950410600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study obtained the diffusivities along the diffusion path of Ni-rich fcc Ni-Al-Cu alloys at different temperatures using the numerical inverse method. Atomic mobilities were assessed based on the calculated diffusivities using the CALTPP program. The validity of the obtained atomic mobilities was confirmed by comparing the model-predicted values with the measured ones.
The diffusivities along the whole diffusion path in one diffusion couple of Ni-rich fcc Ni-Al-Cu alloys at 1273, 1333 and 1433 K are obtained by means of the numerical inverse method. In total 12 diffusion couples are used to obtain the diffusivities at the intersections in the diffusion paths by the Matano-Kirkaldy method. Two sets of atomic mobilities are assessed using the CALTPP program based on the diffusivities calculated by the numerical inverse method and Matano-Kirkaldy method, respectively. The validity of the obtained atomic mobilities is confirmed by comparing the model-predicted diffusivities, concentration profiles and diffusion paths with the measured ones. The whole calculation by the numerical inverse method in CALTPP with higher efficiency can achieve the same accuracy as the Matano-Kirkaldy method. The present study demonstrates that one diffusion couple combined with the numerical inverse method can reliably assess the atomic mobilities for fcc Ni-Al-Cu alloys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available