4.7 Article

Mass Spectrometric Analysis of N-Glycoforms of Soybean Allergenic Glycoproteins Separated by SDS-PAGE

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue 39, Pages 7367-7376

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02773

Keywords

soybean allergy; glycoprotein; N-glycans; ESI-MS; HILIC-ESI-MS/MS

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31370804, 31170773, 21375103, 31300678]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of Northwest University for Natural Science [15NW18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glycosylation of many proteins has been revealed to be closely related with food allergies, and screening and structural analysis of related glycoproteins and glycoallergens are essential for studies in this field. Herein, we describe detailed N-glycoform analysis of all glycoprotein fractions of soybean protein isolate (SPI) separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to disclose structural features of the glycan moieties of more soybean glycoproteins. SPI was fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and the generated protein bands were recovered and subjected to in-gel N-glycan release and labeling using a one-pot method newly developed by our group, followed by detailed analysis by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and online hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-ESI-MS/MS). As a result, we found seven bands mainly containing oligomannose-type glycans; two mainly contain core alpha 1,3-facosylated glycans, and six have no glycans. This study is the first report that discovers core alpha 1,3-fucosylated N-glycans in bands 1, 2, and 6 and discloses bands 3, 4, 5, and 7 as glycoproteins and their N-glycoforms. Therefore, it can expand our knowledge about soybean protein glycosylation and provide significant structural reference for research of soybean allergens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available