4.7 Article

Modeling of biohydrogen production using generalized multi-scale kinetic model: Impacts of fermentation conditions

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 47, Issue 41, Pages 17926-17945

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.291

Keywords

Biohydrogen; Dark fermentation; Multi-scale kinetics; Fermentation modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a new multi-scale kinetic model for predicting biohydrogen production. The study reveals the existence of two prevalent pathways or microbial groups with distinct dynamics in biohydrogen production. Modulating temperature, substrate concentration, and using different types of substrates can control the contribution of different modes in biohydrogen production.
This paper presents a new multi-scale kinetic model built upon the multi-stage growth Hypothesis for predicting biohydrogen production. The proposed model represents the significant factors affecting biohydrogen production using a sum of first-order kinetic terms with varying dynamics from slow to fast one. The current work investigates 52 case studies of biohydrogen production that show the double first-order kinetic model provides the best modeling fitness (R-2 > 0.99). This result suggests two prevalent pathways or microbial groups with distinct dynamics (i.e., fast and slow modes) in biohydrogen production. An increase in temperature (30 degrees C-43 degrees C) or substrate concentration (10 g/L to 40 g/L) and the use of simple substrates or mixed cultures can increase the fast-mode dominance up to 100% contribution. Model analysis suggests that the fast mode corresponds to the butyrate production pathway, the growth-associated hydrogen-producing activity, the easily-biodegradable substrates, or the quick hydrogen-producing groups. (c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available