4.7 Article

Experimental investigations on laminar burning velocity variation of CH4+H2+air mixtures at elevated temperatures

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 47, Issue 37, Pages 16686-16697

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.155

Keywords

Laminar burning velocity; Temperature exponent; Diverging channel; Methane-hydrogen-air mixture; Engine relevant conditions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the laminar burning velocity variation of CH4+H-2+air mixtures at elevated temperatures using an externally heated diverging-channel method. Results showed an increase in burning velocity with higher H2 fraction due to the formation of H-atom as an intermediate, establishing a temperature dependency through a power-law correlation.
The present work reports experimental investigations on laminar burning velocity variation of CH4+H-2+air mixtures at elevated temperatures (300-650 K) using an externally heated diverging-channel method. The effect of mixture equivalence ratio (phi = 0.7-1.3) and H2 fraction (0-50% by volume) on burning velocity have been reported at elevated temperatures. The experimental measurements are compared with numerical simulations using GRI Mech 3.0 and FFCM-1 kinetic models. The obtained results exhibit an increase in the laminar burning velocity with H2 fraction due to the formation of H-atom as an intermediate. The temperature dependency is established through a power-law correlation. The temperature-exponent shows a parabolic variation with a minimum value at phi = 1.1. Reaction pathway diagram interprets the major oxidation paths followed by reactants for higher carbon-consumption with varying H-2 fraction. The P2 pathway involving ethane breakdown plays a major role in enhancing the burning velocity at rich mixture conditions. (c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available