4.7 Article

The heat transfer coefficient similarity between binary and single component flow condensation inside plain pipes

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122450

Keywords

Flow condensation; Heat transfer coefficient; Two-phase flow

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway under the FRINATEK project [275,652]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The heat transfer mechanisms during flow condensation of binary mixtures inside pipes have been extensively studied, and it has been found that the heat transfer coefficient follows a similar scaling law for single and binary component fluids. This discovery reduces the complexity of the model and suggests that the dominant heat transfer resistance is located in the conductive sublayer, unaffected by the flow pattern, liquid film thickness, or mass transfer resistance.
To identify the heat transfer mechanisms during flow condensation of binary mixtures inside pipes has motivated vast research in the past decades. While the prediction capabilities of models have substantially improved due to larger experimental data bases and computational tools, the complexity of the models has grown to a level that makes it difficult to identify the dominant flow and fluid properties contributions. Opposite to this trend, in this work we show that the heat transfer coefficient of single and binary component fluids follows a similar scaling law in terms of a two-phase flow Reynolds number, reducing the complexity of the model substantially. This similarity is attributed to an equivalent heat transfer mechanisms between them and the single-phase flow case. Therefore, it is assumed that the dominant heat transfer resistance is located in the conductive sublayer and thus unaffected by either the flow pattern, liquid film thickness or a mass transfer resistance close to the liquid-vapour interface. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available