4.5 Article

Average maternal hemoglobin decline after first elective cesarean section compared to higher order cesarean sections

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14193

Keywords

blood transfusion; cesarean section; first cesarean section; hemoglobin drop; repeated cesarean section

Ask authors/readers for more resources

First elective cesarean section is associated with greater average blood loss compared to repeated surgery, which may be explained by lower uterine segment scarring.
Introduction Lower uterine segment scarring after cesarean section can decrease intraoperative bleeding during subsequent surgery. We examined whether first elective cesarean section is associated with greater average blood loss compared to repeated surgery. Methods Decrease in maternal hemoglobin and hematocrit after surgery was retrospectively compared between three study groups, women in their first, second and third or more cesarean section. Surgery length and need for blood transfusion were also compared. Results Out of 9401 cases reviewed between January 2010 November 2020, 3917 had a first cesarean section, 3159 s cesarean section and 2325 had a third or more cesarean section. Hemoglobin and hematocrit drops were highest after first cesarean section (1.1 vs 1.0 vs 1.0 mg/dL, P < 0.001 and 3.3 vs 3.0, vs 2.9%, P < 0.001, respectively). Surgery length was significantly longer and more patients after third cesarean section required blood transfusions (2.5% vs 1.4% vs. 0.8%, P < 0.001). First cesarean section, younger age and BMI >35 were associated with increased hemoglobin drop in univariate and multivariate analysis. Conclusions Although repeated cesarean section is associated with longer surgery and higher need for blood transfusion, average hemoglobin drop after first cesarean section is higher. Scarring of the lower uterine segment can explain this paradoxical finding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available