4.7 Article

Multiaxial fatigue behaviour and damage mechanisms of P92 steel under various strain amplitudes and strain ratios at high temperature

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106774

Keywords

Multiaxial fatigue; Strain amplitude; Strain ratio; Cyclic deformation; Damage mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52005250]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021 M691559]
  3. Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds [2020Z320]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High temperature multiaxial fatigue tests were performed at 600 degrees C with different strain amplitudes and strain ratios. The cyclic deformation and damage mechanisms were analyzed using dynamic strain ageing (DSA) analysis and microstructure characterization. The results indicate that increasing strain amplitude and strain ratio accelerate cyclic softening. The DSA behavior depends on strain amplitude, strain ratio, and loading direction. Moreover, increasing strain amplitude promotes subgrain growth and dislocation structure transformation, while increasing strain ratio promotes planar slip of dislocation.
High temperature multiaxial fatigue tests at different strain amplitudes and strain ratios were performed at 600 degrees C. Dynamic strain ageing (DSA) analysis and microstructure characterization were used to analyze the cyclic deformation and damage mechanisms. Results reveal that the increases in strain amplitude and strain ratio accelerate the cyclic softening. Moreover, the DSA behaviour shows a distinct dependence on the strain amplitude, strain ratio and loading direction. Furthermore, the increase in strain amplitude promotes subgrains growth and dislocation structure transformation. Particularly, the increase in strain ratio promotes the occurrence of planar slip of dislocation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available