4.7 Article

Subcycle fatigue crack growth and equivalent initial flaw size model for fatigue life assessment under arbitrary loadings for Al-7075

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106685

Keywords

Life prediction; Fatigue crack growth; Subcycle; Random; Equivalent initial flaw size

Funding

  1. NAVAIR through subcontract from Technical Data Analysis, Inc (TDA) [N68-335-18-C-0748]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel fatigue-life prediction methodology combining a subcycle fatigue crack growth (FCG) analysis and equivalent initial flaw size (EIFS) concept is proposed. The model shows high accuracy in predicting fatigue life under various loading conditions, especially in the near-threshold regime and under multiaxial loadings.
A novel fatigue-life prediction methodology combining a subcycle fatigue crack growth (FCG) analysis and equivalent initial flaw size (EIFS) concept is proposed in this paper. This research focuses on extending a pre-viously developed time-based subcycle fatigue crack growth model to a near-threshold regime and under multiaxial loadings. First, the threshold FCG behavior using subcycle FCG is discussed, and a new temporal kernel function to include intensity factor corresponding to the near-threshold region is proposed. Following this formulation, the multiaxial load case scenario is considered for mixed-mode FCG using a critical plane approach. Next, the general multiaxial loading is converted to an equivalent uniaxial loading for life prediction. Next, model predictions under arbitrary loadings (e.g., uniaxial and multiaxial, constant and variable amplitude loading, and random spectrums) are compared with experimental data from open literature and internal testing. Multiple conclusions and potential future work have been suggested using the proposed model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available