4.6 Article

Electricity frauds detection in Low-voltage networks with contrastive predictive coding

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107715

Keywords

Non-technical loss; Electricity theft; Self-supervised; Contrastive predictive coding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a self-supervised detection method, known as NTL detection contrastive predictive coding (ND-CP), for detecting fraud in low-voltage networks by extracting consumption patterns. The method utilizes 1D-CNN for feature extraction, employs GRU to capture global information, and trains a classifier using contrastive learning, which successfully improves the accuracy of non-technical loss detection.
Non-technical losses cause substantial commercial concerns to distribution network operators (DNOs). 80% of NTLs are related to electricity theft, which contains various high-techs and is increasingly difficult to detect. Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) has enabled supervised machine learning (ML) to detect the NTLs, which significantly improved the detection rates. A further advance in ML type of methods requires sufficient labeled datasets, which is usually not available. To address this, this article proposes a self-supervised detection method that extracts long-term consumption patterns to detect fraud in low-voltage networks, known as NTL detection contrastive predictive coding (ND-CP). Smart meter data sequences are fed into a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) first. The gated recursive unit (GRU) data is then used to extract global information. After that, the output of the prediction from the GRU model is used to construct positive and negative sample pairs for contrastive learning. Eventually, a single-layer neural network classifier for detection is trained using the long-term features extracted by ND-CP. Experiments are conducted with real electricity con-sumption data to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available