4.4 Article

Clinical and Imaging Data-Based Model for Predicting Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome (RPLS) in Pregnant Women With Severe Preeclampsia or Eclampsia and Analysis of Perinatal Outcomes

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 2022, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2022/6990974

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Xiangyang Science and Technology Bureau: Development of Movable Head Mounted Oxygen Supply and Isolation System for Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia [2020ZD01]
  2. 2021 Science and Technology Innovation Project of Xiangyang No.1 Peoples Hospital: Research on Risk Stratification Decision and Key Problems of Prostate Cancer Based on In-Depth Learning of MRI/Ultrasound Radiomics [XYY2021Q16]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81901567]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Provincial Department of Education [Q20202105]
  5. Scientific and Technological Project of Xiangyang City of Hubei Province [2021YL29]
  6. Innovative Research Programme of Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital [XYY2021M02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the risk factors of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) in pregnant women with severe preeclampsia or eclampsia, and found that hypertensive emergency, headache, blood routine, and biochemical indicators are important risk factors for RPLS. The combined model was found to be more effective in predicting RPLS.
Objective. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) in pregnant women with severe preeclampsia or eclampsia (SPE/E) based on a predicting model and to analyze the perinatal outcomes. Methods. From January 2015 to March 2020, 78 pregnant women data diagnosed with severe preeclampsia or eclampsia with cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transcranial Doppler (TCD) screening in Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital and Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into the RPLS group (n = 33) and non-RPLS group (n = 45) based on the MRI results. The general clinical data (blood pressure, BMI, symptoms, and so forth), laboratory examination, TCD results, and perinatal outcomes in the two groups were compared. The risk factors of severe preeclampsia or eclampsia complicated with RPLS were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. The prediction model and decision curve (DCA) were established according to the clinical-imaging data. Results. The univariate analysis showed that poor placental perfusion, hypertension emergency, use of two or more oral antihypertensive drugs, headache, white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet (PLT) count, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), uric acid (UA), serum albumin (ALB), average flow velocity, and resistance index of the posterior cerebral and basilar arteries were significantly different in the RPLS group compared with the non-RPLS group (all P < 0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that hypertensive emergency, headache, WBC, PLT, ALT, and average flow velocity of the basilar artery (BAAFV) were the risk factors in the RPLS group. The aforementioned clinical-imaging data modeling (general data model, laboratory examination model, TCD model, and combined model) showed that the combined model predicted RPLS better. DCA also confirmed that the net benefit of the combined model was higher. In addition, the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, stillbirth, and preterm infants was higher in the RPLS group than in the non-RPLS group (all P < 0.05). Conclusions. More postpartum complications were detected in pregnant women with severe preeclampsia or eclampsia complicated with RPLS. Hypertensive emergency, headache, WBC, PLT, ALT, and BAAFV were the important risk factors for RPLS. The combined model had a better effect in predicting RPLS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available