4.1 Article

Kinetics study of CO2 absorption into methyldiethanolamine, potassium lysinate, and their blends in aqueous solution

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL KINETICS
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages 346-360

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/kin.21563

Keywords

amino acid; chemical solvents; CO2 capture; methyldiethanolamine; reaction kinetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, the kinetics for the reaction of CO2 with three chemical solvents were studied experimentally and theoretically. The absorption flux of CO2 into different solvents and their blends was measured at various pressure and temperature conditions. The effect of adding different solvents on the absorption rate of CO2 was investigated. In addition, the physical properties of CO2 in the solution were examined and a kinetics model was developed to describe the absorption behavior of CO2.
In this work, the kinetics for the reaction of CO2 with three chemical solvents were studied experimentally and theoretically. The CO2 absorption flux into the potassium lysinate (K-Lys), methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), and their blends was measured over the CO2 partial pressure range of 50-500 kPa, and at temperatures 298.15, 303.15, and 313.15 K using a stirred cell reactor. The effect of the addition of K-Lys on the absorption flux of CO2 into MDEA solution at low and high pressure was investigated. The reaction kinetics of CO2 absorption in CO2-loaded MDEA, K-Lys, and MDEA + K-Lys solutions were also examined and absorption flux of CO2 as a function of CO2 loading was determined. The values of CO2 diffusivity, viscosity, the liquid mass transfer coefficient, the overall reaction rate constant, and the physical solubility of CO2 into MDEA + K-Lys solution were reported. Furthermore, a standard kinetics model was developed to describe the CO2 absorption behavior in the solution at low and high pressures, for both unloaded and CO2-loaded systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available