4.6 Article

Investigations on the toolpath strategies for CNC magnetorheological fluid assisted finishing (MFAF) process

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-09307-9

Keywords

Magnetorheological fluid assisted finishing; Nanofinishing; Trochoidal; Spiral; Toolpath planning

Funding

  1. Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi, India [EEQ/2017/000597]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A computer numerical controlled magnetorheological fluid assisted finishing process can super-finish metallic surfaces without human intervention. This study investigates different toolpath strategies and finds that the Trochoidal toolpath is the most suitable for the process.
A computer numerical controlled (CNC) magnetorheological fluid assisted finishing (MFAF) process can super-finish the metallic surfaces of objects without any human intervention. In such a system, a rotating MFAF tool follows a path inside the region to be processed. An appropriate toolpath strategy can significantly reduce surface roughness. This work investigates different toolpath strategies such as Zig-Zag, Hilbert, Peano, Spiral, and Trochoidal for the MFAF process. A comparison is made among these toolpaths on the magnitude of the final surface roughness (R-a) and its variation on the finished profile on a similar domain with the same process parameters. In Zig-Zag and Spiral toolpaths, unidirectional crests are produced as polishing tool passed over the surface; this undesired orientation generates a non-uniform finished surface. The fractal curves such as Hilbert and Peano consist of significantly high numbers of sharp turns, making them unsuitable for the process. The Trochoidal toolpath, conventionally used for high-speed milling operation, is the most suitable toolpath for the MFAF process. The investigation shows that the Trochoidal toolpath reduces a mild steel plate's surface roughness (R-a) from 379 nm to 1.06 nm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available