4.4 Article

Understanding the effect of homogenisation pressure on emulsion and foam properties of aerosol whipping cream

Journal

INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2022.105332

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy (via AiF)
  2. FEI (Forschungskreis der Ernahrungsindustrie e.V., Bonn, Germany) [AiF 19355 N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Homogenisation is a crucial process in the production of aerosol whipping cream (AWC), and this study investigates the impact of different homogenisation pressures on AWC, with and without the addition of a saturated monoacylglyceride of medium chain length (me-sMAG). The results show that adding me-sMAG can improve the texture and stability of AWC, but excessive homogenisation pressure can lead to flocculation and reduced foam firmness.
Homogenisation is an important process step in the production of aerosol whipping cream (AWC). In this study, the effect of homogenisation pressure (0-20 MPa, one-stage and two-stage) on AWC with and without addition of a saturated monoacylglyceride of medium chain length (me-sMAG) was investigated. Particle size distribution via static light scattering and light microscopy, viscosity, overrun, foam firmness, drainage and residual cream were analysed. Processing of model AWC without emulsifier application was not feasible, as it led to coalescence of fat globules and prevented foaming, because the surface active material did not suffice to stabilise the newly created fat globule surface. In samples with me-sMAG addition an increase of the homogenisation pressure up to 6/1 MPa led to a decrease of the fat globule size, which correlated with improved foam firmness and reduced drainage. Homogenisation above 6/1 MPa induced flocculation of fat globules and reduced the foam firmness. (C)& nbsp;2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available