4.4 Article

Deltoid ligament repair versus trans-syndesmotic fixation for bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.063

Keywords

Ankle fracture; Deltoid ligament repair; Syndesmosis; Trans-syndesmotic fixation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared different treatment methods for isolated unstable distal fibula fractures, finding that direct deltoid ligament repair yields similar functional scores and fewer reoperations compared to trans-syndesmotic fixation at midterm follow up. The most common reason for reoperation was the removal of hardware.
Introduction: The role of deltoid ligament repair is controversial in the treatment of bimalleolar equiv-alent ankle injuries. Our purpose was to compare midterm functional outcomes and reoperation rates of unstable distal fibula fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the fibula and either deltoid ligament repair, trans-syndesmotic fixation, or combined fixation. Methods: Skeletally mature subjects were retrospectively identified after fixation of isolated unstable distal fibula fractures treated at a single academic level 1 hospital from January 2005 to May 2019. The AAOS Foot and Ankle Module outcomes questionnaire (AAOS-FAM) was obtained at a mean time from surgery of 4.6 + /-3.1 years. Subjects underwent one of three methods of fixation including distal fibula ORIF and one of the following: trans-syndesmotic fixation ( N = 66), deltoid ligament repair ( N = 16), or combined trans-syndesmotic fixation and deltoid ligament repair ( N = 26). Outcomes scores and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were compared between groups by Kruskal-Wallis testing for non-normally distributed data. Rates of reoperation were compared by Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set to P < 0.05 for all comparisons. Results: There was no significant difference in AAOS-FAM scores between the three groups ( P = 0.18). No subjects in the deltoid ligament repair group underwent reoperation compared to 17 (26%) in the trans-syndesmotic fixation group and six (23%) in the combined fixation group. The most common reason for reoperation was removal of hardware, which was performed in 12 (18%) subjects in the trans-syndesmotic fixation group and three (12%) subjects in the combined fixation group. Conclusions: Direct deltoid ligament repair yields similar functional scores and fewer reoperations com-pared to trans-syndesmotic fixation at midterm follow up. Deltoid ligament repair may be a favorable treatment strategy when considering trans-syndesmotic fixation in the surgical treatment of unstable distal fibula fractures. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available