4.5 Review

The roles and therapeutic potential of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) in sarcoma

Journal

CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 151-163

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10555-015-9601-1

Keywords

Cyclin-dependent kinase; Sarcoma; Kinase inhibitor; Targeted therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Gattegno and Wechsler funds
  2. Kenneth Stanton Fund
  3. Sarcoma Foundation of America (SFA)
  4. National Cancer Institute (NCI)/National Institutes of Health (NIH) [CA 151452-01]
  5. Sarcoma SPORE/NIH
  6. Academic Enrichment Fund of MGH Orthopaedics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uncontrolled proliferation and cell growth is the hallmark of many different malignant diseases, including sarcomas. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are members of the serine/threonine protein kinase family and play crucial roles in tumor cell proliferation and growth by controlling cell cycle, transcription, and RNA splicing. In addition, several CDKs influence multiple targets and phosphorylate transcription factors involved in tumorigenesis. There are many examples linking dysregulated activation and expression of CDKs to tumors, and targeting CDKs in tumor cells has become a promising therapeutic strategy. More recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib for treating metastatic breast cancer. In sarcomas, high levels of CDK mRNA and protein expression have been found in most human sarcoma cells and patient tissues. Many studies have demonstrated consistent results in which inhibition of different CDKs decrease sarcoma cell growth and induce apoptosis. Therefore, CDKs comprise an attractive set of targets for novel anti-sarcoma drug development. In this review, we discuss the roles of different members of CDKs in various sarcomas and provide a pre-clinical overview of promising therapeutic potentials of targeting CDKs with a special emphasis on sarcoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available