4.5 Article

Utility of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists and Ustekinumab in Postoperative Crohn's Disease

Journal

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
Volume 28, Issue 12, Pages 1865-1871

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac030

Keywords

adalimumab; drug monitoring; infliximab; postoperative Crohn's; ustekinumab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data on therapeutic drug monitoring in postoperative Crohn's disease are limited. This study found that higher concentrations of tumor necrosis factor antagonists were associated with improved outcomes, while ustekinumab concentrations did not show a relationship with outcomes.
Lay Summary Data are lacking on therapeutic drug monitoring in postoperative Crohn's disease. The current study found that tumor necrosis factor antagonist concentrations above established drug thresholds were associated with improved outcomes. In contrast, for ustekinumab, no relationship between drug thresholds and outcomes existed. Background: In postoperative Crohn's disease (POCD), data are lacking on relationships between serum biologic concentrations and treatment outcomes. We assessed if established threshold concentrations of infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), and ustekinumab (UST) impact outcomes in POCD. Methods: Data were extracted from POCD patients with serum biologic concentration measurements using Weill Cornell Medicine biobanks. The primary outcome compared rates of deep remission (achieving both objective [endoscopic or biomarker] and clinical [Harvey-Bradshaw index or Crohn's Disease Patient Reported Outcome-2] remission), using established serum drug level cutoffs of IFX >= 3 mu g/mL, ADA >= 7.5 mu g/mL, and UST >= 4.5 mu g/mL. Results: In 130 patients, median IFX, ADA, and UST concentrations were 10 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.9-26.9) mu g/mL, 10.5 (IQR, 4.9-14.9) mu g/mL, and 6.9 (IQR, 5.1-10.2) mu g/mL, respectively. In patients with IFX >= 3 mu g/mL, higher rates of deep remission (39% vs 0%; P = .02) existed compared with those with IFX <3 mu g/mL. Similar differences existed for clinical (44% vs 9%; P = .04) and objective (83% vs 62%; P = .1) remission. In patients with ADA >= 7.5 mu g/mL, rates of deep (42% vs 0%; P = .02), clinical (42% vs 0%; P = .02), and objective (88% vs 40%; P = .007) remission were higher than patients with lower concentrations. For UST, rates of deep (28% vs 17%; P = 1.0), clinical (33% vs 33%; P = 1.0), and objective (70% vs 67%; P = 1.0) remission were similar between patients regardless of drug concentration. Conclusions: In POCD, established anti-tumor necrosis factor concentrations were associated with improved outcomes. No relationship between UST concentrations and postoperative outcomes existed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available