4.7 Article

Effect of supramolecular structural changes during the crystalline transformation of cellulose on its enzymatic hydrolysis

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 180, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114687

Keywords

Cellulose allomorphs; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Cellulase adsorption capacity; Interchain hydrogen bonds; C-6 hydroxymethyl conformation

Funding

  1. International Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation Program of the State Key Research and Development Program [2021YFE0114400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22168020, 21766014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effect of cellulose allomorphs on hydrolysis efficiency and found that cellulose II allomorph exhibited higher efficiency. These findings provide theoretical support for a better understanding of cellulose enzymatic hydrolysis.
Currently, the main problems in cellulose conversion to glucose are the low enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency and the high cellulase cost. In this study, cellulose I allomorph substrates were from p-toluenesulfonic acid (PT), dilute sulfuric acid (DA) and sulfite (SP) treated cellulose substrates, and cellulose II allomorph were prepared by mercerization. XRD, NMR, FTIR and molecular docking were used to investigate the effect of cellulose allomorphs on hydrolysis efficiency. The results showed that cellulose II allomorph had a lower cellulase adsorption capacity and higher hydrolysis efficiency. This was because cellulose II allomorph owned gt conformation, and less tg and gg conformations of C-6 hydroxymethyl, causing the reduction of interchain hydrogen bonds and the increase in hydrolysis efficiency (PT, DA and SP: from 62.04%, 65.62% and 63.21% to 83.23%, 89.24% and 87.65%, respectively). This study provided theoretical supports for further understanding the effect of cellulose allomorphs on enzymatic hydrolysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available