4.6 Review

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 in a car cabin assessed through 3D CFD simulations

Journal

INDOOR AIR
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/ina.13012

Keywords

car cabin; CFD analysis; respiratory particles; risk of infection; SARS-CoV-2; virus transmission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study estimated the risk of infection from the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant for passengers sharing a car cabin with an infected subject for a 30-minute journey. Different factors were investigated, and the results showed that the risk of infection is influenced by key parameters and can be controlled by designing the flow patterns of the indoor environment.
In this study, the risk of infection from SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant of passengers sharing a car cabin with an infected subject for a 30-min journey is estimated through an integrated approach combining a recently developed predictive emission-to-risk approach and a validated CFD numerical model numerically solved using the opensource OpenFOAM software. Different scenarios were investigated to evaluate the effect of the infected subject position within the car cabin, the airflow rate of the HVAC system, the HVAC ventilation mode, and the expiratory activity (breathing vs. speaking). The numerical simulations here performed reveal that the risk of infection is strongly influenced by several key parameters: As an example, under the same ventilation mode and emitting scenario, the risk of infection ranges from zero to roughly 50% as a function of the HVAC flow rate. The results obtained also demonstrate that (i) simplified zero-dimensional approaches limit proper evaluation of the risk in such confined spaces, conversely, (ii) CFD approaches are needed to investigate the complex fluid dynamics in similar indoor environments, and, thus, (iii) the risk of infection in indoor environments characterized by fixed seats can be in principle controlled by properly designing the flow patterns of the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available