4.7 Article

An Improved Spatial Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Non-Convex Optimal Electricity-Gas Flow

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 1326-1339

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3101883

Keywords

Manganese; Pipelines; Mathematical model; Programming; Optimization; Compressors; Approximation algorithms; Optimal electricity-gas flow; branching strategy; spatial branch-and-bound; mixed-integer bilinear programming; non-convex optimization

Funding

  1. National Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2020YFE0200400, TPWRS-00162-2021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, an improved spatial branch-and-bound algorithm is proposed to solve the non-convex problem in optimal electricity-gas flow models. The algorithm divides the problem into convex and small sub-models and uses a novel spatial branching strategy to improve effectiveness and efficiency. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm in terms of feasibility, optimality, and efficiency.
Addressing non-convexity plays a fundamental role in solving the optimal electricity-gas flow models. In this paper, an improved spatial branch-and-bound algorithm is proposed to solve the non-convex problem, which is formulated as a mixed-integer bilinear programming, for its exact solution. The core of the algorithm is to divide the non-convex model into convex and small sub-models by branching on specific continuous variables, so that the non-convex problem can be equivalent to a rooted tree for exploration. The exactness of the algorithm is guaranteed by the same criterion as the classical branch-and-bound algorithm. To alleviate the computational burden, a novel two-stage spatial branching strategy is developed to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the branching operations. The performance of the proposed algorithm is verified on two integrated electricity-gas systems with different sizes. Numerical results demonstrate that our method achieves a balance among feasibility, optimality, and efficiency. The comparison with another 6 convexification-based methods, 3 state-of-the-art non-convex optimization solvers, and 2 spatial branch-and-bound algorithms with classical branching rules further shows the superiority of our algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available