4.8 Review

A Comprehensive Review on CubeSat Electrical Power System Architectures

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 3161-3177

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3110002

Keywords

CubeSat; Payloads; Low earth orbit satellites; Computer architecture; Space vehicles; Planetary orbits; Energy management; CubeSat; dc-dc converters; electrical power system (EPS); low earth orbit (LEO) satellites; nanosatellites

Funding

  1. Advanced Power and Energy Center at Khalifa University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides an extensive review of conventional and emerging EPS architectures of CubeSats, identifying and classifying 17 categories. It presents operational aspects and a qualitative comparison of these architectures. The article serves as a useful reference guide for researchers and developers in the field, and offers potential research topics for further exploration and innovation in CubeSat EPS.
CubeSats have been popular for space research due to lower cost, faster development, and easier deployment. The electrical power system (EPS) is one of the significant subsystems for the CubeSat since it handles power generation, energy storage, and power distribution to all other subsystems. Therefore, the design of EPS becomes crucial for successful CubeSat mission, wherein the first step is the selection of EPS architecture. The main objective of this article is to present an extensive review of all the conventional and emerging EPS architectures of CubeSats. A total of 17 categories of CubeSat EPS architectures have been identified, classified, and the operational aspects of these architectures are presented in addition to a qualitative comparison. This article is expected to provide a useful reference guide for all the researchers and developers working in the area of CubeSats EPS. Also, some of the potential research topics are provided to further exploration and innovation for the CubeSat EPS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available