4.8 Article

Operating Limits for Low-Capacitance Cascaded H-Bridge Static Compensators

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 3421-3433

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3111201

Keywords

Capacitors; Automatic voltage control; Oscillators; Steady-state; Feedforward systems; Topology; STATCOM; Cascaded H-bridge (CHB); circulating current injection; compensation region of negative-sequence currents; multilevel converter; static compensator (STATCOM); thin dc capacitor

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research Global [N62909-19-1-2081]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a detailed analysis of the viable operating region for the cascaded H-bridge low-capacitance static compensator (LC-StatCom) in both balanced and unbalanced conditions. It provides a method for sizing the dc-link capacitors and derives reference steady-state signals for control loops.
The cascaded H-bridge (CHB) low-capacitance static compensator (LC-StatCom) has a limited inductive region compared to a conventional StatCom, both in balanced and unbalanced conditions, due to the inherent large oscillations on the capacitor voltages. This article presents a detailed analysis of the viable operating region in these converters that takes into account the inherent large oscillations. The analysis facilitates sizing of the dc-link capacitors to ensure that the StatCom is able to inject a given range of positive- and negative-sequence current. Though the analysis is generic and applicable to the CHB StatComs with relatively large capacitance values, it is more relevant in the LC-StatComs. In addition, the article derives reference steady-state signals that can be used as feedforward terms in LC-StatCom control loops to enhance the control performance. The article presents simulation and experimental results, in balanced and unbalanced conditions to corroborate the proposed analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available