4.8 Article

Analysis and Mitigation of DC Voltage Imbalance for Medium-Voltage Cascaded Three-Level Neutral-Point-Clamped Converters

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 4320-4336

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3129877

Keywords

Control systems; Voltage control; Topology; Costs; Switches; Pulse width modulation; Medium voltage; Cascaded three-level neutral-point-clamped (3L-NPC) converters; medium-voltage direct-current (MVdc); voltage imbalance

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, U.K. [EP/T021969/1]
  2. Flexible Integrated Energy Systems (FLEXIS)
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), through the Welsh Government [WEFO case 80836]
  4. EPSRC [EP/T021969/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, a small-signal model-based analysis is conducted to uncover the cause of dc voltage imbalance in cascaded 3L-NPC converters. Two voltage balancing methods are proposed, one based on PI controllers and the other based on inverse-droop control. Experimental validation demonstrates the effectiveness of both methods in balancing the dc voltages of SMs under changing load conditions and dc bus voltages.
The cascaded three-level neutral-point-clamped (3L-NPC) converter and the modular multilevel converter (MMC) are attractive solutions for medium-voltage direct-current (MVdc) applications. Due to their low cost compared to MMCs, cascaded 3L-NPC converters have been adopted in ANGLE-DCx2014;a 30-MVA MVdc link demonstration project in North Wales, U.K. The dc voltage imbalance across submodules (SMs) is a common challenge for both types of MVdc converters. Such imbalance is topology dependent and remains underresearched for cascaded 3L-NPC converters. In this article, a small-signal model-based analysis has been done to reveal that the dc voltage imbalance in cascaded 3L-NPC converters is caused by an unstable system pole. Two voltage balancing methods are presented. The first method is based on PI controllers to precisely regulate SMsx2019; voltages without influencing output power. However, it relies on communication between a central controller and local controllers within SMs. The second method uses inverse-droop-based control to take over the dc voltage regulation upon loss of communication. Both balancing methods are experimentally validated using a 30-kVA testbed based on the ANGLE-DC project. It has been demonstrated that the dc voltages of SMs can be effectively balanced with both methods during changes of load conditions and dc bus voltages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available