4.6 Article

Cylindrical Cavity Optimization for Resonant-Tunneling Diode Oscillators

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages 2658-2667

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2022.3150146

Keywords

Oscillators; Inductance; Q-factor; Shape; Capacitance; Resonant tunneling devices; Geometry; Modeling; optimization; oscillators; resonant-tunneling devices; resonators

Funding

  1. European Union [765426]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work focuses on the theoretical shapes of cavities for RTD lumped-element oscillators, aiming to achieve the highest operational frequency. By employing functional variation principles and the EFIE method, simple design parameters were derived for smaller cavities, and the maximum achievable frequency was calculated using these new cavities.
In this work, the theoretical shapes of cavities were investigated as suited for resonant-tunneling diode (RTD) lumped-element oscillators to achieve the highest possible operational frequency. The scope of this work is restricted to cylindrical cavities that are in their dimensions much smaller or similar to the free-space wavelength. The idea is to find a shape that has the highest quality factor possible. The proposed analysis is based on functional variation principles coupled with electric-field integral equation (EFIE) method of moments solver. Simple design parameters were found covering the cavities that are much smaller than the free-space wavelength. The maximum reachable frequency was calculated with these types of new cavities using some theoretical RTD parameters. The theoretical limitation of frequency was also defined for given RTD parameters and fabrication limitations originating from the contact resistance and RTD radius. In order to demonstrate the significance of the findings, a theoretical geometry was compared with a practical resonator shape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available