4.7 Article

Investigation of Three Potential Stress Inducement Tasks During On-Road Driving

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3112811

Keywords

Stress; Task analysis; Vehicles; Physiology; Heart rate variability; Protocols; Automation; Stress; workload; driver; sensor; ecg; hrv

Funding

  1. European Union [688900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study successfully induced stress using the n-back task with high inter-individual variation on a group level. Performing the n-back task simultaneously with a tactile detection response task doubled average response times. Stress-inducing secondary tasks led to sympathetic nervous activation, resulting in increased heart rate, respiration rate, and decreased heart rate variability.
A driving study was performed to induce stress with 24 participants performing different inducement tasks (n-back task, Sing-a-Song Stress Test and noise exposure). Both performance-based measures (Tactile Detection Response Task) as well as subjective measures were recorded to assess the driver state. Subjective ratings indicate that stress was most successfully induced on a group level with the n-back task with high inter-individual variation. The average response times doubled during the n-back task for a simultaneously performed tactile detection response task compared to baseline response times. Sympathetic nervous activation resulting in the increase of heart rate, respiration rate and decrease in heart rate variability (RMSSD) was found as a physiological reaction on stress-inducing secondary tasks. The most prominent physiological responses were found during the modified Sing-a-Song Stress Test. Subjective ratings on the perceived stress level and physiological response rarely correlated. This study provided reference data for driver state algorithm development in the EU-funded project ADAS&ME.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available