4.5 Article

A Low Bit-Width LDPC Min-Sum Decoding Scheme for NAND Flash

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCAD.2021.3100273

Keywords

Decoding; Manganese; Iterative decoding; Reliability; Hardware; Error correction; Throughput; Bit-width; low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes; min-sum decoding; NAND flash memory

Funding

  1. Key Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2019B010107001]
  2. NSFC [61821003, 61872413, U1709220, 61902137]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1003305, 2018YFA0701800]
  4. 111 Project [B07038]
  5. Key Project of Shandong Wisdom Joint Fund [ZR2019LZH009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a low-density parity-check (LDPC) decoding algorithm for NAND flash memory, focusing on the tradeoff between implementation complexity and decoding performance. The proposed low-bit-width decoding scheme, using quasi-cyclic LDPC (QC-LDPC) and improved row-layered normalized min-sum algorithm, achieves a lower uncorrectable bit error rate (UBER) without significantly increasing computational complexity.
For NAND flash memory, designing a good low-density parity-check (LDPC) decoding algorithm could ensure data reliability. When the decoding algorithm is implemented in hardware, it is necessary to achieve an attractive tradeoff between implementation complexity and decoding performance. In this article, a novel low-bit-width decoding scheme is introduced. In this scheme, the quasi-cyclic LDPC (QC-LDPC) is used, and the row-layered normalized min-sum algorithm is improved by restricting the amplitude of minimum and second-minimum values in each check node (CN) updating. The simulation shows that our approach achieves a lower uncorrectable bit error rate (UBER) with a negligible increase in computational complexity, especially with low-precision input log-likelihood ratio (LLR).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available