4.6 Article

Fast Background Calibration of Linear and Non-Linear Errors in Pipeline Analog-to-Digital Converters

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCSII.2021.3135424

Keywords

Analog to digital converter; pipeline; background calibration; dither; non-linear error; linear error

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new digital calibration method for the design and implementation of high speed and high-resolution pipeline ADCs. Two techniques are used to calibrate the linear and non-linear characteristics of the gain stages. Compared to prior methods, the proposed algorithm can estimate errors in the ADC with fewer conversion samples.
The CMOS scaling and power usage limitations make the calibration techniques inevitable in the design and implementation of pipeline analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) especially in high speed and high-resolution applications. In this brief, a new digital method is introduced which requires only a shift register and some logic blocks compared to traditional correlation-based background techniques meanwhile improving converter's characteristics superior to prior methods. Here, two techniques are introduced to calibrate the linear and third-order non-linearities of the gain stages. Making use of the proposed algorithm, to the best of our knowledge, both the linear and non-linear errors in the multiplier digital-to-analog converter (MDAC) are estimated with lower number of conversion samples compared to the correlation-based reported methods. To verify and test the effectiveness of this new method, a model of 12-bit, 100 MS/s pipeline converter is calibrated through simulation. As a result, 21 dB and 25 dB improvements are achieved in behavioral simulated results of SNDR and SFDR respectively through about 1 center dot 8x10(6) conversion cycles and, INL and DNL of the ADC, are tuned +0.2/-0.3 LSB and +0.18/-0.11 LSB, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available