4.6 Article

Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Survey

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages 1173-1185

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3117407

Keywords

Biomedical imaging; Image analysis; Task analysis; Adaptation models; Transfer learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Image segmentation; Domain adaptation; domain shift; machine learning; deep learning; medical image analysis

Funding

  1. NIH [AG041721]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper surveys the recent advances of domain adaptation methods in medical image analysis, presents the motivation of introducing domain adaptation techniques to tackle domain heterogeneity issues in medical image analysis, and reviews the recent domain adaptation models in various medical image analysis tasks.
Machine learning techniques used in computer-aided medical image analysis usually suffer from the domain shift problem caused by different distributions between source/reference data and target data. As a promising solution, domain adaptation has attracted considerable attention in recent years. The aim of this paper is to survey the recent advances of domain adaptation methods in medical image analysis. We first present the motivation of introducing domain adaptation techniques to tackle domain heterogeneity issues for medical image analysis. Then we provide a review of recent domain adaptation models in various medical image analysis tasks. We categorize the existing methods into shallow and deep models, and each of them is further divided into supervised, semi-supervised and unsupervised methods. We also provide a brief summary of the benchmark medical image datasets that support current domain adaptation research. This survey will enable researchers to gain a better understanding of the current status, challenges and future directions of this energetic research field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available