4.7 Article

Delay Range for Consensus Achievable by Proportional and PD Feedback Protocols With Time-Varying Delays

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages 3212-3219

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2021.3096899

Keywords

Delays; Protocols; Robustness; PD control; Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions; Topology; Power system dynamics; Maximal delay range; proportional-derivative (PD) protocol; robust consensus; time-varying delay

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61973060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines the delay range for robust consensus of unstable first-order agents using proportional and proportional-derivative control protocols subject to time-varying delays. The results show that the agent dynamics and the graph connectivity may limit the range of tolerable delays, and incorporating the delay variation rate in the design of the PD control protocol can expand the range of achievable robust consensus.
This article examines the delay range for robust consensus of unstable first-order agents by using proportional (P) and proportional-derivative (PD) control protocols subject to time-varying delays. The maximal delay range is defined by the delay consensus margin (DCM), which is a robustness measure within which consensus can be achieved robustly despite the presence of uncertain and time-varying delays. We apply an H-infinity-type small-gain analysis to multiagent systems, which results in explicit lower bounds on the DCM for both undirected and directed graphs. The results provide sufficient conditions for robust consensus for all time-varying delays that may vary within the range. It is seen that the agent dynamics and the graph connectivity may fundamentally limit the range of tolerable delays. It is also found that the DCM can be increased beyond that achieved by the P protocol by incorporating the delay variation rate in the design of the PD control protocol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available