4.6 Article

Effective Scaling of Blockchain Beyond Consensus Innovations and Moore's Law: Challenges and Opportunities

Journal

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 1424-1435

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2021.3087798

Keywords

Blockchain; Benchmark testing; Throughput; Scalability; Peer-to-peer computing; Technological innovation; Tools; Blockchain; consensus mechanism; Moore’ s law; performance benchmarking; scalability

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61872195, 61872240]
  2. Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20200038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article evaluates various blockchain proposals over the past decade and finds the potential for consensus-based scaling to be limited. It introduces topology and hardware innovations for scaling blockchain.
As an emerging technology, blockchain has achieved great success in numerous application scenarios, from intelligent healthcare to smart cities. However, a long-standing bottleneck hindering its further development is the massive resource consumption attributed to the distributed storage and consensus mechanisms. This makes blockchain suffer from insufficient performance and poor scalability. In this article, we evaluate numerous representative blockchain proposals in the past decade and demonstrate that the potential of the widely adopted consensus-based scaling is seriously limited, especially in the current era when Moore's law-based hardware evolution is about to end. We achieve this by developing an open-source benchmarking tool, called $\text{Prism}, with which we further investigate the resource-related factors that hinder the current scaling attempts. Furthermore, we discuss various topology and hardware innovations which could help to scale up blockchain. Generally speaking, this article provides blockchain researchers many valuable insights because it explores the next-generation scaling strategies by conducting a large-scale benchmarking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available