4.7 Article

Spirometer Based on Vortex Whistle to Monitor Lung Disorders

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 11162-11172

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3170314

Keywords

Sensors; Monitoring; Electron tubes; Lung; Smart phones; Resonant frequency; Atmospheric modeling; Monitoring lung disorders; spirometer; vortex whistle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes a method for monitoring lung disorders using a battery-less spirometer sensor and a vortex whistle for measurement. The physical characteristics of the vortex whistle sound were theoretically clarified and experimentally validated. Based on the results, the signal processing conditions for acquiring spirometer information from the vortex sound were determined.
This paper describes a method to monitor lung disorders such as the sequelae of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) and asthma. A battery-less spirometer sensor element used in microphone-equipped devices such as smartphones was adopted. A vortex whistle was employed to measure the blowing flow rate and pressure. The physical characteristics of the vortex whistle sound frequency, blowing flow rate, blowing pressure, and sound pressure were theoretically clarified. Moreover, the structural conditions necessary to ensure a high performance of the whistle were experimentally derived, and the theoretically derived characteristics were experimentally validated using an actual whistle. The experimental results and theoretically derived characteristics were in agreement, and the sound frequency was noted to be linearly proportional to the flow rate. Furthermore, the sound pressure increased to +40 dB / decade as the frequency increased, and the outlet pressure was proportional to the square of the frequency. On the basis of these results, the signal processing conditions to acquire the information pertaining to the spirometer from the vortex sound were clarified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available