4.7 Article

The Role of Families in Decisions Regarding Cancer Treatments

Journal

CANCER
Volume 121, Issue 7, Pages 1079-1087

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29064

Keywords

cohort study; colorectal neoplasms; lung neoplasms; decision-making; shared; professional-family relations

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [U01CA093344]
  2. NCI [U01CA093332]
  3. Harvard Medical School/Northern California Cancer Center [U01CA093324]
  4. RAND/University of California at Los Angeles [U01CA093348]
  5. University of Alabama at Birmingham [U01CA093329]
  6. University of Iowa [U01 CA093339]
  7. University of North Carolina [U01CA093326]
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs [CRS02-164]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDShared decision-making is an important component of patient-centered care and is associated with improved outcomes. To the authors' knowledge, little is known concerning the extent and predictors of the involvement of a patient's family in decisions regarding cancer treatments. METHODSThe Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) Consortium is a large, multiregional, prospective cohort study of the cancer care and outcomes of patients with lung and colorectal cancer. Participants reported the roles of their families in decision-making regarding treatment. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess patient factors associated with family roles in decisions. RESULTSAmong 5284 patients, 80 (1.5%) reported family-controlled decisions, with the highest adjusted rates (12.8%) noted among non-English-speaking Asians. Among the 5204 remaining patients, 49.4% reported equally sharing decisions with family, 22.1% reported some family input, and 28.5% reported little family input. In adjusted analyses, patients who were married, female, older, and insured more often reported equally shared decisions with family (all P <.001). Adjusted family involvement varied by race/ethnicity and language, with Chinese-speaking Asian (59.8%) and Spanish-speaking Hispanic (54.8%) patients equally sharing decisions with family more often than white individuals (47.6%). Veterans Affairs patients were least likely to report sharing decisions with family, even after adjustment for marital status and social support (P <.001). CONCLUSIONSThe majority of patients with newly diagnosed lung or colorectal cancer involve family members in treatment decisions. Non-English-speaking Asians and Hispanics rely significantly on family. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of family involvement in treatment decisions on outcomes; until then, physicians should consider eliciting patients' preferences for family involvement. Cancer 2015;121:1079-1087. (c) 2015 American Cancer Society. In this large study of patients with newly diagnosed lung or colorectal cancer, the majority of patients reported involving family members in treatment decisions. Non-English-speaking Asian and Hispanic patients were particularly likely to rely on family for decision-making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available